Current Issue

 

Share

Search
BeisMoshiach.org
Web
Tags
#1000 #1001 #1002 #1003 #1004 #1005 #1006 #1007 #1008 #1009 #1010 #1011 #1012 #1013 #1014 #1015 #1016 #1017 #1018 #1019 #1020 #1021 #1022 #1023 #1024 #1025 #1026 #1027 #1028 #1029 #1030 #1031 #1032 #1033 #1034 #1035 #1036 #1037 #1038 #1039 #1040 #1041 #1042 #1043 #1044 #1045 #1046 #1047 #1048 #1049 #1050 #1051 #1052 #1053 #1054 #1055 #1056 #1057 #1058 #1059 #1060 #1061 #1062 #1063 #1064 #1065 #1066 #1067 #1068 #1069 #1070 #1071 #1072 #1073 #1074 #1075 #1076 #1077 #1078 #1079 #1080 #1081 #1082 #1083 #1084 #1085 #1086 #1088 #1089 #1090 #1091 #1092 #1093 #1094 #1095 #1096 #1097 #1098 #1099 #1100 #1101 #1102 #1103 #1104 #1106 #1107 #1108 #1109 #1110 #1111 #1112 #1113 #1114 #1115 #1116 #1117 #1118 #1119 #1120 #1121 #1122 #1123 #1124 #1125 #1126 #1127 #1128 #1129 #1130 #1131 #1132 #1134 #1135 #1136 #1137 #1138 #1139 #1140 #1141 #318 #319 #350 #383 #390 #550 #560 #594 #629 #642 #776 #777 #778 #779 #780 #781 #782 #783 #784 #785 #786 #787 #820 #823 #824 #825 #826 #827 #828 #829 #830 #831 #832 #833 #834 #835 #836 #837 #838 #839 #840 #841 #842 #843 #844 #845 #846 #847 #848 #849 #850 #851 #852 #853 #854 #855 #856 #857 #858 #859 #860 #861 #862 #863 #864 #865 #866 #867 #868 #869 #870 #871 #872 #873 #874 #875 #876 #876 #877 #878 #879 #880 #881 #882 #883 #884 #885 #886 #887 #888 #889 #890 #891 #892 #893 #894 #895 #896 #897 #898 #899 #900 #901 #902 #903 #904 #905 #906 #907 #908 #909 #910 #911 #912 #913 #914 #915 #916 #917 #918 #919 #920 #921 #922 #923 #924 #925 #926 #927 #928 #929 #930 #931 #932 #933 #934 #935 #936 #937 #938 #939 #940 #941 #942 #943 #944 #945 #946 #947 #948 #949 #950 #951 #952 #953 #954 #955 #956 #957 #958 #959 #960 #961 #962 #963 #964 #965 #966 #967 #968 #969 #970 #971 #972 #973 #974 #975 #976 #977 #978 #979 #980 #981 #982 #983 #984 #985 #986 #987 #988 #989 #990 #991 #992 #993 #994 #995 #996 #997 #998 #999 1 Kislev 10 Kislev 10 Shvat 10 Shvat 10 Teives 11 11 Nissan 112 Tammuz 12 Tammuz 13 Iyar 13 Tishrei 14 Kislev 15 Elul 15 Menachem-Av 15 Shvat 17 Tammuz 18 Elul 19 Kislev 2 Iyar 20 Av 20 Mar-Cheshvan 20 Menachem-Av 20 Teives 22 Shvat 24 Teives 25 Adar 27 Adar 28 Nissan 28 Teives 29 Elul 3 Tammuz 33 Tammuz 352 5 Teives 6 Tishrei 7 Adar 770 864 865 881 9 Adar 9 Av 9 Kislev 903 Acharei-K'doshim Achdus Adar Ahavas Yisroel Alef-Beis Alter Rebbe Amalek Argentina Arizal army Artwork Aseres HaDibros Australia Avoda Zara B’Chukosai B’Shalach Baal Shem Tov baal t'shuva Baba Sali Balak BaMidbar bar mitzva Basi L'Gani B'Chukosai be Bein HaMeitzarim Beis HaMikdash Beis Nissan Beth Rivkah B'Haalos'cha B'Har B'Har-B'Chukosai Birthday Bitachon Blindness Bo B'rachos Brazil brit milah Brussels B'Shalach chai v'kayam Chanuka Chassidic Rabbis Chayei Sara Chernobil Chevron children chinuch Chitas Choshen Chukas Churban controversy convert Dan Diary of the late R’ Saadya Maatuf Dollars dreams D''varim Editor's Corner Eikev Elul Emor Europe fire France free choice Gaza Gentiles Georgia Gulf War Gush Katif Haazinu Hakhel HaYom Yom Hebron hiskashrus Holy Temple Honoring Parents Hospitality IDF Igrot Kodesh India Intermarriage Internet Iran Iron Curtain Israel Japan Jewish Refugee Crisis Kabbala K'doshim Kfar Chabad Ki Savo Ki Seitzei Ki Sisa KIDDUSH LEVANA Kiryat Gat Kislev kKi Sisa Kohen Gadol Korach korbanos KOS SHEL BRACHA Krias Shma K'vutza Lag B'Omer lashon ha'ra Lech Lecha letter Litvishe maamer Machatzis HaShekel mahn Mar-Cheshvan marriage Massei Matot Mattos Mattos-Massei Menachem Av Menora Metzora Mexico Miami MiKeitz MIkvah Mishkan Mishpatim Mitteler Rebbe Mitzva Tank Mitzvah Tanks Mivtza Kashrus MIvtza Neshek Mivtza T’fillin Mivtza Tefilin Morocco Moshe Rabbeinu Moshiach & Geula Moshiach Seuda music Napoleon Naso niggunim Nissan Nitzavim Nitzavim-VaYeilech Noach Noachide North Africa olive oil painting Parshas Parah parshas re'eh Parshas Zachor Pesach Pesach Sheini Pinchas Pirkei Avos P'kudei Poland prayer Prison Purim R’ Avrohom Schneersohn Rabbi Hillel Zaltzman Rabbi Levi Yitzchok Rabbi Mordechai Eliyahu Rabbi Shlomo Galperin Rambam Ramban Rashbi Rashi Rebbe Rebbe Maharash Rebbe Rashab Rebbe Rayatz Rebbe Rayatz & Joint Rebbetzin Chana Rebbetzin Chaya Muska Rebbetzin Rivka Red Heifer R'ei Rishon L'Tzion Rosh Chodesh Rosh HaShana Russia S’firas HaOmer Samarkand seifer Torah s'firas ha'omer Shabbos Shabbos Chazon Shabbos Hagadol Shabbos Nachamu shalom bayis Shavuos Shekalim shiduchim Shlach shleimus ha'Aretz shliach shlichus Shmini Shmita Shmos Shoftim shtus Shvat simcha Simchas Torah South Africa Sukkos summer tahalucha Talmud Torah Tanya Tazria-Metzora te Tehilim Teives Terror teshuva Tetzaveh t'fillin the omer the soul tisha b'av Tishrei Toldos Tomchei T'mimim Truma t'shuva tTruma Tzanz Tzav Tzedaka Tzemach Tzedek Tzfas tzimtzum Tzitzis Ukraine Upsherinish VaEira VaEs'chanan VaYakhel VaYakhel-P’kudei VaYechi VaYeilech VaYeira VaYeishev VaYeitzei VaYigash VaYikra VaYishlach Vocational Schools Winter women Yechidus Yerushalayim Yeshiva Yisro Yom Kippur Yom Tov Zohar Zos HaBracha. B'Reishis סיביר
Visitor Feed
Wednesday
Nov072018

A MIRACLE THAT YITZCHOK LOOKED LIKE HIS FATHER?

Since Yishmoel is characterized by chesed just like Avrohom, but as an expression of klipa there is in a sense a greater affinity between Yishmoel and Avrohom than Yitzchok and Avrohom

Translated by Boruch Merkur

4. […] The Torah states, “These are the descendants of Yishmoel, etc.,” describing how he sired a great dynasty, “twelve princes, etc.” It is highly perplexing though that Yishmoel merited such greatness.

The Torah therefore addresses this difficulty by stating, “Yishmoel was the son of Avrohom”: Yishmoel’s vast progeny was not his own accomplishment, G-d forbid; it was in virtue of G-d’s pledge to Avrohom: “Regarding Yishmoel, I have acceded to your request” that “he will beget twelve princes, etc.” Yishmoel benefitted from the chesed of Avrohom, and was therefore blessed with a multitude of offspring. Since Avrohom was abundantly benevolent, he (extended opportunity even to Yishmoel, and) told G-d, “If only Yishmoel would live” – and not only “live” but “live before You,” alluding to Supernal chesed (which is called “g’dula – greatness”), infinite kindness (the Divine attribute with which G-d created and sustained twenty-six generations [i.e., ten generations from Adam to Noach, ten from Noach to Avrohom, and six generations from Avrohom until the revelation at Mount Sinai], providing for the needs of humanity with His kindness [despite their lack of Torah and Mitzvos] ––P’sachim 118a.) As explained in Chassidus, the chesed of Avrohom (prior to his circumcision) embodied this attribute of g’dula.

Now, since the Torah refers to Yishmoel’s descendance from Avrohom, it cannot neglect to mention Yitzchok’s descendance from him as well; the Torah must also state that Yitzchok was the “son of Avrohom.” And once Torah describes him as “Yitzchok son of Avrohom,” it goes on to add that “Avrohom begot Yitzchok” – for two reason: 1) In order to rule out the claim of the scoffers of the generation [who said that Avimelech was the father of Yitzchok], as Rashi comments. 2) Although Torah traces the lineage of both Yishmoel and Yitzchok to Avrohom, the descendance of Yitzchok from Avrohom was entirely different. Not only was Yitzchok the son of Avrohom, but “Avrohom begot Yitzchok.” That is, Avrohom’s focus and aspiration was entirely on Yitzchok, and as it is written, “For your progeny will be called (specifically) by [the descendants of] Yitzchok.”

5. But there is a deeper understanding of this matter, of the fact that the Torah must emphasize the relationship of Yitzchok to Avrohom because the Torah traces Yishmoel to Avrohom:

The spiritual difference between Avrohom and Yitzchok is widely known (S’forno; see also Klei Yakar on the parsha, as well as Ohr HaTorah). Avrohom was a chariot to the Divine attribute of chesed, benevolence. He served G-d primarily through acts of kindness and by providing hospitality. Yitzchok, on the other hand, was a chariot to the Divine attribute of g’vura, severity and discipline. The Torah therefore describes Yitzchok’s digging of wells, which is the process of excavating earth and stones, and revealing springs of water that rush up to the surface from below.

The same distinction exists in the unholy sense: Klipa syphoned kindness from Avrohom and tapped into the severity of Yitzchok. Thus, from Avrohom, Yishmoel emerged, chesed d’klipa (the unholy forces assuming the role of benefactor), whereas emerging from Yitzchok was Eisav, g’vura d’klipa (the severity and discipline of the unholy forces).

Since Yishmoel is characterized by the quality of chesed (just like Avrohom, but as an expression of klipa, and since Yishmoel is described as “emerging” from Avrohom, “yatza mimeno”), overtly there is a greater affinity between Yishmoel and Avrohom than Yitzchok and Avrohom. Yitzchok embraced the approach of severity and discipline, the opposite of chesed. Torah therefore must also say about Yitzchok that despite his spiritual difference, he is the son of Avrohom, even adding that “Avrohom begot Yitzchok.” Indeed, Yitzchok is the main offspring of Avrohom.

6. The above also sheds light on the commentary of Rashi, “What did the Alm-ghty do? He fashioned Yitzchok’s face to resemble the face of Avrohom.” Evidently, a special action on the part of G-d was required here. But at first glance, a son resembles his father according to the laws of nature (unless there are factors that contribute to the son not sharing his father’s likeness. Also, see Eiduyos 2:9 and the commentary of Rambam there.) Why then was a miracle required to make Yitzchok appear like Avrohom? (Footnote 32: In Agadas B’Reishis Ch. 37, it states: “The Alm-ghty commanded the angel … ‘Do not fashion him to resemble his mother. Rather, he should resemble his father.’” This too, however, requires explanation. Why if not for G-d’s command would he resemble his mother and not his father?)

But according to the discussion above, this matter is understood. The fact that a son resembles his father is because the son is derived from the father, from his body and soul. Thus, he resembles his father both physically and by the character of his soul.* But since spiritually Avrohom and Yitzchok were opposites – the soul of Avrohom deriving from chesed and the soul of Yitzchok from g’vura – they were also opposite in terms of mindset. (The latter concept is widely known in terms of the difference between Beis Shammai and Beis Hillel – that because of the difference of their souls, their manner of thinking differed: Beis Shammai was inclined toward stringency and Beis Hillel toward leniency.) According to the laws of nature, Avrohom and Yitzchok would have been different, even opposites, and the difference would have been particularly apparent in their faces, since facial features and appearance reflect the person’s mindset – as it is said, “A man’s wisdom illuminates his face.”** Therefore it was necessary [for G-d to do a special miracle and] to “fashion Yitzchok’s face to resemble the face of Avrohom.”

NOTES:

*Footnote 33: See Perush HaRambam there:

Physical attractiveness and beauty as well as longevity come from the life [force of the father]. That is, since they are similar in character, the duration of the son’s life will undoubtedly approximate that of his father. This principle applies in most cases. Also, regarding [other] natural circumstances, the same resemblance typically applies. A man who has a defect will likely bequeath it to his son. A son will enjoy wealth from his father. If the father is wise, he typically imparts that to his son by teaching him.

In Tosefta the Sages dispute the opinion of Rebbi Akiva, saying that a father only brings merit to the son with regard to these five things [mentioned in the Mishna: beauty, strength, wealth, wisdom, and longevity] throughout the son’s youth, not having yet reached the age when Mitzvos are incumbent upon the son. However, once he’s reached that age, if the son is righteous, he brings merit upon himself of his own consequence, but if not, his father does not pass it on to him.

**Footnote 37: especially regarding the Avos, who comprise the Merkava (B’Reishis Rabba 47:6, 82:6), certainly their bodies (their facial appearance) corresponded to the character of their souls.

(From the address of Shabbos Parshas Toldos 5725, Sichos Kodesh 5725, pg. 134-136)

 

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.